Gay Marriage: Social Calamity or Long Overdue? Essay

AbstractThere is emergence attention to the issue of wedding equality for dauntless people in this country. As of the writing of this paper, 16 of the 50 states in the United States of America pee-pee reasonedized jocund marriage, every by legislation or by popular vote (Wisniewski, 2013). The communication regarding the issue gather ups quite contentious for the nigh part because of non-secular ideology that has demonized the belief of homosexuality for numerous age. As a sociological issue, the meshing has become a divisive hale for many, from political powers as far deck to the family level. The constitution guarantees equal ripes for all in this country freedom of religion, speech, etc. hitherto appears to stall when equal overcompensates for the sprightly connection are involved. There has been significantly to a greater extent popular support for the cause recently, muchover the stigma and prejudice cut across to linger. Is this a moral debate or has an noncurrent ideology become so embraced by many that the battle has only scantily begun?Are Rights Really Equal?When asked if matchless believes in equal rights for all citizens, the typical, rote learning response is a resounding Yes. If the indecision becomes more specific as to allow in the right for homosexuals to marry, a hesitation follows. The concept of gay marriage is far deeper a societal problem for most because its root lie in prejudicial perspectives that perplex permeated us for age. Before the fight for the right to marry, the gay community has long endured entirely the right to exist openly without speck pariah-like. The United States is not a theocracy, of this we are certain. However, there are many more religiously affiliated citizens than not. The First Amendment gives us freedom of religion, which should also include freedom from religion. The truth of the matter meets somewhere in between the two, especially when US notes bears In God We Trust bol dly on its face.There are political leaders who continue to evoke the frame of God in their speeches, even thoughthe fact is that our founding fathers were mostly non-theists and the shibboleth on our money did not inculcate until 1958 or so. But people continue to view homosexuality as a sin, therefore gay marriage is not an option. This issue has created a grant in this country, much like most other civil rights draw. When slavery was abolished, it took years to establish anti-segregation laws. Civil change takes time, historically, and gay marriage is no different. Protests continue either in support of or against gay marriage, at times becoming violent. Families become divided when a member openly announces his or her orientation and disapproval prevails, sometimes resulting in families disowning or ostracizing that offender from the family.Government has been forced to become involved, imputable to an outcry for the various rights that are bestowed upon a married member of this society. Rights to inheritance and to personal medical information and decision make are two examples of spousal rights. monogynic homosexual couples are denied these rights, since without marriage, the rights fall to their circumferent relative. Functional Sociology and Gay hymeneals confederation has long viewed traditional marriage a fundamental and necessary building block. espousal is the institution by which our population is regenerated and issue are brotherlyized then integrated as mattering members. Functional theorists baron argue that if the paradigm is changed to include very(prenominal) sex couples, social decay may follow, as the family unit is unable to function if not in the traditional way. individual upraise households fork up been faulted with producing children that score set down in school than those from the traditional, two parent family, as well as have higher judge of unacceptable social behavior, such as drug holler or teenage pregna ncy. Functionalists believe children arrive at from each gender parent in a different way, therefore require two to be whole. (Tischler, 2011)Conflict hypothesis and Gay MarriageConflict possible action maintains that society functions when a more muscular or accepted sector exerts its go out and exceeds at the expense of less respectable or accepted portions. (Tischler, 2011). Since homosexuality has been regarded out(p) by the majority for so long, heterosexuals have maintained their position of acceptance and normality in the US. Vocational positions,especially effectual ones such as political leaders, have historically been heterosexual. We have a electric chair and a First Lady pass judgment heterosexuality. For the stigma to be removed, traditionally judge and understood ways of life would drastically change. Would traditional, heterosexual marriage decay in the process? The Future of Marriage careless(predicate) of sociological theory, religious belief, and cultu ral expectation, the try towards acceptance of gay marriage is gaining neural impulse and losing the attached stigma. Gay marriage is legal in 16 states (Wisniewski, 2013), and gay couples right to adoption has increased. Heterosexual divorce rates remain hovering at a 50% mark, and have been for many years previous to homosexual marriage. Society is resilient, proving itself over years of change. The ideal aspiration would be for both homosexual and heterosexual married couples to solely co-exist neither having any real becharm over the others success or demise.ReferencesTischler, H.L. (2011) substructure to Sociology. Retrieved from https//online.vitalsource.com//books/9781285396835/pages/55834839 Wisniewski, M (2013) Update 1-Illinois Governor Signs Same-Sex Marriage Into Law. Retrieved from http//www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/20/usa-gaymarriage-illinois-idUSL2N0J524N20131120.