CALD Groups for Individual and Systematic Factors-myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theCALD Groups for Individual and Systematic Factors. Answer: Introduction The population of Australia consists of twenty-eight percent CALD communities (Estrada Messias, 2015). The department is health findings it hard to offer affordable health coverage for the CALD population. The Australian authorities categorize the CALD as individuals from similar origins. Additionally, the executive views the CALD as any other native Australian. Therefore, the terms of medical attention are standard irrespective of the background of a person. The assumption by the national government that everybody living in Australia has similar culture is disadvantaging the CALD group. The ministry of health has availed the medical resources for every Australian regardless of race. However, the CALD keep off from the health facilities because of a lot of reasons. The disparity in culture, racist notions and reading from different scripts hamper the CALD from accessing medical attention (Goeman et al., 2016). This report looks at the results of the survey of the communities. Furthe rmore, the paper covers the factors preventing the CALD population from seeking medical help. Additionally, the article discusses the recommendations that the government can use to reach out to the community. Various stakeholders should implement the suggestions in the paper to solve the disparity in the access to health. Findings A team of specialists researched the reasons why the CALD communities stayed away from hospitals. The group interviewed a sample of individuals from the main migrant societies. The Burmese, Pacific Islanders, the Afghani and the Sudanese are the majority of the immigrants (Henderson Kendall, 2011). The group of researchers asked them about their view of the Australian health policies. The researchers needed the output from the minority group to look for possible ways of solving the health quagmire. The finding included the following responses. The CALD have a feeling that physicians do not respect their culture (Henderson Kendall, 2011). They are accustomed to traditional modes of treatment which the Australian physicians are not providing (Mengesha, Perz, Dune Ussher, 2018). Additionally, there is a language barrier between the communities and the clinicians (Meuter, Gallois, Segalowitz, Ryder Hocking, 2015). Language problems create communication break-up between the two partie s. Furthermore, there are no qualified personnel to aid in interpreting one language to the other. The language translators who exist are not well versed in all the languages. Hence, they mislead the physicians and the CALD communities. Discussion From the findings, the major issues impeding the CALD from accessing health care are a breakdown in communication, cultural misunderstandings, and health policy barriers. Communication Impediments Lack of understanding between the caregivers and the patients destabilizes the quality of medical attention. The physicians cannot understand the health concerns of the CALD group due to the disruption in communication (Meuter, et al., 2015). A significant group of immigrants does not understand the language that the clinicians use. Even if a language translator is present, medical attention cannot succeed yet (Woodward-Kron et al., 2016). An efficient treatment needs the privacy between the physician and the patient. Cultural Misunderstanding The cultures of the CALD differ from that of the Australian natives. A majority of natives believe in the power of traditional medicine. However, the Australian health policies consider the suggestion of traditional medication to be outdated and ineffective (Na, Ryder Kirmayer, 2016). The clashing of cultures hinders the provision of medical attention. Barriers to health policy Policy barriers involve a poor health culture by the health practitioners. The Australian administration is unaware of health concerns of the CALD groups (Pound Greenwood, 2016). Additionally, the health department lacks efficient modes of language translations. Conclusion The Australian government should conceder appropriate recommendations to solve the healthcare problems affecting the CALD groups. The CALD stay away from health facilities due to some reasons. The migrant's groups feel that the healthcare methods are racist. The CALD also suffer to the clash in culture between the native Australians and themselves. Additionally, there is a communication break up between the natives and migrants. The migrants believe in traditional medicine as opposed to the Australian government which beliefs in modern medication. Migrants are not fluent in spoken English which the clinicians use during treatment. Finally, the Australian Health Policy lacks methods to counter the effects of language barriers. Recommendations The Australian government should train language translators to assist the CALD group who do not understand the English language. The translators should be present at all point of medical attention. The management of health facilities should ensure that the CALD patients can easily and freely access the services of a language interpreter. On the issue of cultural misunderstanding, the national administration should make their services to be flexible. The health practitioners should do conclusive research on traditional modes of treatment. Additionally, the physicians should integrate those forms of medical attention with the modern ways of healthcare provision. Physicians should grant the wishes of the CALD however impossible; they may seem. The government should consider serious changes to its health policies. The administration should collect data on the types of ailments that affect the CALD communities. The clinicians should then look for ways of finding solutions to the health problems affecting the immigrant groups. References Estrada, R. D., Messias, D. K. H. (2015). A scoping review of the literature: content, focus, conceptualization, and application of the national standards for culturally and linguistically appropriate services in health care. Journal of health care for the poor and underserved, 26(4), 1089-1109. Goeman, D., Michael, J., King, J., Luu, H., Emmanuel, C., Koch, S. (2016). Partnering with consumers to develop and evaluate a Vietnamese Dementia Talking-Book to support low health literacy: a qualitative study incorporating codesign and participatory action research. BMJ Open, 6(9), e011451. Henderson, S., Kendall, E. (2011). Culturally and linguistically diverse peoples' knowledge of accessibility and utilization of health services: exploring the need for improvement in health service delivery. Australian journal of primary health, 17(2), 195-201. Mengesha, Z. B., Perz, J., Dune, T., Ussher, J. (2018). Talking about sexual and reproductive health through interpreters: the experiences of health care professionals consulting refugee and migrant women. Sexual Reproductive Healthcare. Meuter, R. F., Gallois, C., Segalowitz, N. S., Ryder, A. G., Hocking, J. (2015). Overcoming language barriers in healthcare: A protocol for investigating safe and effective communication when patients or clinicians use a second language. BMC health services research, 15(1), 371. Na, S., Ryder, A. G., Kirmayer, L. J. (2016). Toward a Culturally Responsive Model of Mental Health Literacy: Facilitating Help?Seeking Among East Asian Immigrants to North America. American journal of community psychology, 58(1-2), 211-225. Pound, C., Greenwood, N. (2016). The human dimensions of post-stroke homecare: experiences of older carers from diverse ethnic groups. Disability and rehabilitation, 38(20), 1987-1999. Woodward-Kron, R., Hughson, J. A., Parker, A., Bresin, A., Hajek, J., Knoch, U., ... Story, D. (2016). Culturally and linguistically diverse populations in medical research: perceptions and experiences of older Italians, their families, ethics administrators and researchers. Journal of public health research, 5(1).